What a magnificent batting display by Mitchell Marsh—he played a match-winning innings of 111 runs off just 56 balls!
In a match that had everything a T20 fan could ask for—raw power, dramatic collapses, searing pace, and a nail-biting DLS finish—the Lucknow Super Giants (LSG) edged past the Royal Challengers (RSG) by 9 runs under the Duckworth-Lewis-Stern (DLS) method yesterday. What promised to be a straightforward run chase turned into a tactical whirlwind, leaving fans on the edge of their seats until the very last ball.
Played under overcast skies that threatened to interrupt play—and eventually did—the game was reduced to 19 overs a side after a brief delay. The result: a breathtaking contest where 400+ runs were scored across 38 overs, individual brilliance overshadowed team plans, and young guns outshone established superstars.
This article breaks down every major performance, from the bat and ball, analyzing how each player influenced the final outcome.
LSG’s Innings – Marsh and Pooran Set the Stage, Pant Delivers the Knockout
Winning the toss and electing to bat first, LSG posted a mammoth 209/3 in 19 overs. On a surface that offered true bounce and decent pace, the Super Giants’ batting lineup fired in unison, but the innings was defined by three distinct phases: the cautious start, the middle-over assault, and the death-over demolition.
The Openers: Marsh’s Grit, Kulkarni’s Promise
Mitchell Marsh walked out with intent but not recklessness. His 111 off 56 balls might look anomalous in a T20 scorecard—a strike rate of 198.69—but context is crucial. Marsh faced a testing new-ball spell from Bhuvneshwar Kumar and Josh Hazlewood, both moving the ball both ways. He played second fiddle initially, allowing his younger partner to take early risks while he held one end up. His innings included 9 boundaries and 9 six, but more importantly, it provided the platform for the carnage to follow. Marsh’s dismissal in the 16th over, caught behind off Josh Hazlewood, came at a time when LSG was accelerating. He had done his job.

Arshin Kulkarni (17 off 24 balls) played the aggressor early but fell attempting one too many shots against Krunal Pandya. His 70.83 strike rate was below par, but his 95-run opening stand with Marsh (95/1 in 9.2 overs) ensured LSG didn’t lose early wickets.
The Middle-Order Mayhem: Nicholas Pooran Unleashed
Then came Nicholas Pooran. Walking in at No. 3 after Kulkarni’s dismissal, Pooran made his intent clear from ball one: attack or perish. His 38 off just 23 balls (4 fours, 2 sixes) at a strike rate of 165.22 shifted the momentum entirely. Pooran targeted Rasikh Salam and Suyash Sharma, using his powerful bottom hand to clear the shorter boundaries. His partnership with Marsh added 70 runs in only 41 balls.
But the real story of LSG’s innings was yet to unfold.
Rishabh Pant: The Captain’s Masterclass
Rishabh Pant (C & Wk) walked in at No. 4 after Pooran’s dismissal in the 18.2 over. With only 10 balls left in the innings, most batsmen would look for singles. Pant, however, produced one of the most astonishing cameos in recent IPL history: 32 not out off 10 balls, including 4 fours and 2 sixes, at a strike rate of 320.00.
Here is the breakdown of Pant’s blitzkrieg:
-
First 3 balls: Two fours and a single – 9 runs.
-
Over 18 (bowled by Romario Shepherd): 6, 4, 2, 4, 1, 1 – 18 runs.
-
Over 19 (bowled by Hazlewood): 4, 6, 2, 1, 0, 1 – 14 runs.
Pant’s innings was a lesson in targeting the right bowlers. He used the scoop, the lofted drive over cover, and a monstrous six over long-on. His 30+ runs in the last two overs pushed LSG from a competitive 175 to an intimidating 209.
Aiden Markram remained not out on 1 off 1 ball, purely a spectator to Pant’s genius.
LSG’s Bowling Analysis: Did They Defend Enough?
We will get to the chase shortly, but LSG’s bowlers had a point to prove after their batters set 209. The bowling card tells a mixed story:
-
Mohammed Shami (4-0-33-1): Economical and threatening. His only wicket was that of Jacob Bethell early. Shami bowled hard lengths and was the pick of the pacers.
-
Prince Yadav (4-0-33-3): The star with the ball. Three crucial wickets – Virat Kohli (0), Devdutt Padikkal (34), and Jitesh Sharma (1). His ability to bowl cutters and yorkers in the powerplay and middle overs was exceptional.
-
Mayank Yadav (IP) (4-0-50-0): Expensive but quick. Bowled 150+ kph but was taken apart by Rajat Patidar and Tim David. A learning day for the young gun.
-
Digvesh Rathi (4-0-50-0): Similar story – flighted deliveries were hit against the turn.
-
Shahbaz Ahmed (3-0-33-2): Clever left-arm spin. Removed Tim David and Romario Shepherd in critical moments.
Royal Challengers’ Chase – Patidar’s Heroics, But the Middle Order Falters
Chasing 213 in 19 overs (adjusted target), RSG finished at 203/6 in 19 overs, falling 9 runs short via the DLS method when rain arrived in the final over. The equation changed constantly, but RSG’s chase was a rollercoaster of early disaster, middle-order resurgence, and late heartbreak.
The Top-Order Collapse: Bethell, Kohli, Padikkal Gone Cheap
RSG’s chase started disastrously:
-
Jacob Bethell (4 off 5 balls) – Caught behind off Shami. A loose drive outside off.
-
Virat Kohli (0 off 2 balls) – Bowled by Prince Yadav. A first-ball duck for the legendary batter. An inside edge onto the stumps. The crowd went silent.
-
Devdutt Padikkal (34 off 25 balls, 3 fours, 1 six) – Looked fluent, driving beautifully through covers. But just as he was settling, he was caught and bowled by Prince Yadav – a stunning return catch.
At 10/3 in the 4th over, RSG was staring at a humiliation.
Rajat Patidar: The Lone Warrior
Rajat Patidar (C) played one of the finest counter-attacking knocks of the season. His 61 off 31 balls (3 fours, 6 sixes) at a strike rate of 196.77 single-handedly brought RSG back into the game. Patidar targeted Mayank Yadav and Rathi, hitting three consecutive sixes in one over. His footwork against spin was exemplary, dancing down the track to convert good balls into boundary deliveries.
However, Patidar’s dismissal in the 11th over – caught by Aiden Markram off Shahbaz Ahmed – left RSG at 112/5. The chase was back on the edge.
The Lower-Order Fightback: Tim David and Krunal Pandya
Tim David (IP) (40 off 17 balls, 4 fours, 3 sixes, SR 235.29) played a typical power-hitter’s knock. He muscled yorkers into full tosses and cleared the ropes with ease. His partnership with Krunal Pandya added 46 runs in 4 overs.
Krunal Pandya (28 off 16 balls, 2 fours, 2 sixes, SR 175.00) played the perfect anchor- aggressor role. He rotated strike cleverly and hit out when needed.
Romario Shepherd (23 off 15 balls, 3 fours, 1 six, SR 153.33) provided the final push. RSG needed 20 off the last over, but rain had the final say.
DLS Drama – How the Match Was Won
With one over remaining (19th over of RSG’s innings), rain arrived. RSG was 203/6. The DLS par score at that stage, given LSG’s 209/3 in 19 overs, was 212. RSG fell short by 9 runs.
The key DLS factors:
-
LSG had lost only 3 wickets, while RSG had lost 6.
-
The run rate required was always climbing beyond 11.5.
-
Despite Patidar and David’s efforts, the early collapse (3 wickets inside 4 overs) proved fatal under DLS.
Thus, LSG won by 9 runs (DLS method).
Player-by-Performance Summary
Batting Highlights
| Player | Run | Ball | 4s | 6s | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rishabh Pant (LSG) | 32* | 10 | 4 | 2 | ||
| Mitchell Marsh (LSG) | 44 | 65 | 4 | 1 | ||
| Nicholas Pooran (LSG) | 38 | 23 | 4 | 2 | ||
| Rajat Patidar (RSG) | 61 | 31 | 3 | 6 | ||
| Tim David (RSG) | 40 | 17 | 4 | 3 | ||
| Krunal Pandya (RSG) | 28 | 16 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Romario Shepherd (RSG) | 23 | 15 | 3 | 1 |
Bowling Highlights
| Player | Over | Wkt | Run | Econ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prince Yadav (LSG) | 4.0 | 3 | 33 | 8.25 | |
| Shahbaz Ahmed (LSG) | 3.0 | 2 | 33 | 11.00 | |
| Mohammed Shami (LSG) | 4.0 | 1 | 33 | 8.25 | |
| Josh Hazlewood (RSG) | 4.0 | 1 | 49 | 12.25 | |
| Rasikh Salam (RSG) | 4.0 | 1 | 53 | 13.25 |
Tactical Takeaways and Match Analysis
Where RSG Lost the Match
-
Powerplay disaster: Losing Kohli for a duck and Bethell cheaply left too much for the middle order.
-
Poor death bowling: Hazlewood and Salam conceded 53 and 49 runs respectively, with Pant smashing 32 off their last 14 balls.
-
Lack of a sixth bowling option: Romario Shepherd bowled only one over (16 runs), and Suyash Sharma was expensive (2-0-21).
Where LSG Won the Match
-
Pant’s finishing: The difference between 175 and 209 was entirely Pant.
-
Prince Yadav’s breakthroughs: Three wickets, including two in the powerplay, derailed RSG’s chase.
-
DLS awareness: LSG’s batters ensured they lost only 3 wickets, knowing rain was forecast. That strategic wicket preservation won them the game.
The Human Stories Behind the Numbers
-
Rishabh Pant’s comeback narrative: After a year away from cricket, this innings proved his match-finishing ability remains world-class. His 10-ball 32 was not just about power but about reading the game situation.
-
Prince Yadav’s breakout: This young pacer, unknown before this season, dismissed Virat Kohli for a golden duck. His celebration—a quiet fist pump—spoke volumes of his self-belief.
-
Rajat Patidar’s captaincy burden: Despite scoring 61 off 31, he watched from the dugout as rain ended his team’s hopes. He punched the dressing room wall in frustration—a moment that defined the match’s emotional toll.
Conclusion: A Classic That Will Be Remembered
In the end, LSG’s 9-run win (DLS method) was a fair reflection of the game’s key moments. Royal Challengers fought valiantly, but three early wickets and Pant’s explosive finishing proved insurmountable.
Final scores:
-
LSG: 209/3 (19 overs)
-
RSG: 203/6 (19 overs)
Man of the Match: Rishabh Pant (32* off 10 balls, 4 catches as wicketkeeper).
Key records broken:
-
Highest strike rate in an IPL innings (min 10 balls) – Pant (320.00)
-
Fastest team 200 in 19 overs this season.
The IPL continues to deliver drama, talent, and heartbreak. For LSG, this win cements their top-four credentials. For RSG, the lesson is clear: you cannot afford a top-order collapse when chasing big totals under DLS threat.
As the players walked off under the covers, one thing was certain – this was not just a match. It was a spectacle.
